Scaling, transforming, reinventing, building.

How does de-risking generative AI relate to digital transformation?

De-risking generative AI benefits from lessons learned in past digital transformations, particularly in areas like change management and data readiness. However, AI's probabilistic nature and unpredictable outputs demand unique risk mitigation and trust-building approaches.

Andrea leverages her past experiences to effectively blend the old with the new, applying established best practices while also providing insights to address the novel challenges presented by generative AI.

Here is a sample of case studies from her previous roles. Click on the + to read.

4: AI generative Podcast from my 2024 Master’s Dissertation on AI and misleading content

Situation

In 2024, I completed my Master’s dissertation—a 12,000+ word analysis of accountability when generative AI systems hallucinate. Given its length and complexity, I wanted to make my philosophical arguments more accessible. To achieve this, I experimented with Google NotebookLM, using it to generate a short AI-generated podcast summarising my research. My primary aim was to evaluate generative the tool’s ability to accurately follow a script (e.g. my paper) and avoid generating fabricated information while exploring its potential to enhance and expand academic work. Specifically, I was interested in how well it could handle my nuanced arguments on capacitarianism (a philosophical theory related to responsibilism).

Task

I had two key objectives:

  1. To create a concise, engaging podcast script that distilled the core arguments of my dissertation.

  2. To use Google NotebookLM (a generative AI tool) to generate the podcast and critically evaluate its performance in terms of accuracy, adherence to the script, and its handling of complex philosophical concepts.

It was important that the final podcast accurately reflected my research without introducing extraneous or misleading information.

Action

After inputting my paper into Google NotebookLM, I closely monitored the AI’s output, paying particular attention to its interpretation of my philosophical arguments.

The results were surprising. While NotebookLM successfully captured and analysed my complex arguments, it also expanded beyond my research in unexpected ways. For example, it introduced concepts like learning language through Reality TV—an interesting tangent but unrelated to my dissertation. The first generated version also veered off-topic, discussing AI companions’ morality, a subject entirely outside my research scope. This underscored the need for human oversight. Even submitting the same paper multiple times to NotebookLM resulted in different podcast versions. This just goes to show how generative AI is probabilistic – you don't always get the same answer to the same question.

Result

The AI-generated podcast effectively condensed my 12,000-word dissertation into a clear and engaging 12-minute format. Despite initial challenges, the tool demonstrated an impressive ability to mimic understanding of complex philosophical ideas. However, the experiment also reinforced the necessity of human oversight. While AI tools can potentially enhance academic work and improve accessibility, they also tend to introduce irrelevant content, requiring careful review and refinement.

Ultimately, the project successfully achieved my goal of making my research more accessible while providing valuable insights into AI’s capabilities and limitations in academic and professional contexts.

(By listening to the external content you accept the terms and conditions of Spotify)

Listen to my experimental AI-generated podcast here.